Skip to main content

The movie 'Noah' banned by Muslims


The movie Noah is coming soon to a screen near you, unless you live in a Muslim country.  A "fatwa" (religious injunction) was issued against the film last week by Muslim authorities.  Censors in Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates have now concluded that the film "contradicts the teachings of Islam."  Other Muslim nations are expected to follow suit.

The problem is not that Muslims do not believe in Noah—he is mentioned throughout the Qur'an, and an entire chapter (Surah 71) is devoted to his story.  It is that they are opposed to representing sacred figures in art.  The fatwa declares that such movies "are forbidden in Islam and a clear violation of Islamic law."  Depictions of the Prophet Mohammed have sparked deadly protests across the last decade.  A similar reaction could ensue if Noah is shown in Muslim cultures.

Here's my question today: as we seek to engage our culture, how far is too far?

Richard Niebuhr's classic Christ and Culture describes five ways Christians relate to society:
  • "Christ against culture" (no engagement with each other)
  • "Christ of culture" (the church adopts what the culture embraces)
  • "Christ above culture" (following Jesus on Sunday and cultural norms on Monday)
  • "Christ and culture in paradox" (using culture to advance the church)
  • "Christ transforming culture" (leading culture to adopt holistic biblical values).
Except for the third option, which seems clearly to be hypocritical, there are times when each of the others is appropriate.  With pornography, substance abuse, and other sinful behavior, we should choose "Christ against culture."  With appropriate technology, we should  choose "Christ of culture."  With popular but not sinful media, we should choose "Christ and culture in paradox."  And at all times we should embrace "Christ transforming culture."

So, where do we draw the line?  We are not to offend our brother (1 Corinthians 8:4-13), but nearly anything we do might offend someone.  For instance, the movie Son of God condenses Jesus' story so that Peter's declaration, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" (Matthew 16:18) is not clearly in Caesarea Philippi, where the Bible says it occurred (v. 13).  Most viewers won't notice, but I've visited both sites more than 20 times and know the difference.  Now I might wonder what else the movie changed.  But believers are using it as a wonderful evangelistic tool, inviting their friends to watch it with them and talking together about Jesus afterwards.

When do we engage culture, and when do we endorse it?  Are there fixed lines, or do they move with the person and situation?  Should we prescribe our beliefs for others, or trust believers to find and follow God's will for themselves?  Please share your thoughts in our comments section.

And remember that "Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners" (1 Timothy 1:15), but he never became one (Hebrews 4:15).  How will you follow his example today?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COMMIT TO

In the face of widespread insecurity, fear, and hopelessness, our nation desperately needs your prayers. Join us in praying for our nation, that God will heal our land.

Pablo reprende a Pedro

Pero cuando Pedro vino a Antioquía, le resistí cara a cara, porque era de condenar. Pues antes que viniesen algunos de parte de Jacobo, comía con los gentiles; pero después que vinieron, se retraía y se apartaba, porque tenía miedo de los de la circuncisión. Y en su simulación participaban también los otros judíos, de tal manera que aun Bernabé fue también arrastrado por la hipocresía de ellos. Pero cuando vi que no andaban rectamente conforme a la verdad del evangelio, dije a Pedro delante de todos: Si tú, siendo judío, vives como los gentiles y no como judío, ¿por qué obligas a los gentiles a judaizar? Nosotros, judíos de nacimiento, y no pecadores de entre los gentiles, sabiendo que el hombre no es justificado por las obras de la ley, sino por la fe de Jesucristo, nosotros también hemos creído en Jesucristo, para ser justificados por la fe de Cristo y no por las obras de la ley, por cuanto por las obras de la ley nadie será justificado. Y si buscando ser justificados en Cristo, tamb...

El quebrantamiento de Pedro

If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view .     Leer | Lucas 22.54-62 11 de noviembre de 2014 El orgullo de Pedro era un obstáculo para los propósitos de Dios. Cristo buscaba a un siervo-líder para que guiara a los creyentes una vez que Él regresara al cielo. El antiguo pescador era un impulsivo sabelotodo, pero el Señor vio su potencial a pesar de su arrogancia. Por eso, el gran Artesano utilizó una filosa herramienta —la humillación— para quebrantarlo. Cuando las palabras del Señor estuvieron en conflicto con la opinión de Pedro, el discípulo reprendió temerariamente a Jesús. El Salvador respondió con una virulenta reprimenda, tanto para silenciar como para enseñar ( Mt 16.21-23 ; Jn 13.5-8 ). Inclusive, Pedro incumplió su promesa de morir por el Señor cuando lo negó tres veces ...