Skip to main content

Why Anthony Weiner matters to America


It was "the moment Weiner was waiting for," headlines The Atlantic.  New York City mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner admitted on Tuesday that he engaged in "sexting" (sending explicit pictures of himself) after the 2011 scandal that led to his resignation from Congress.

He was clearly prepared for this news to break.  His wife stood by his side, stating: "I love him, I have forgiven him, I believe in him," and the sexting issue is "between us."  Weiner claimed that "in many ways things are not much different than they were yesterday."

On one hand, there is abundant recent precedent for his political comeback.  Eliot Spitzer resigned as New York's governor in 2008 following reports of his activities with prostitutes, but is now running for comptroller of New York City.  Mark Sanford admitted an affair in 2009, but was recently elected to Congress from South Carolina.  Despite Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinski, his popularity is at an all-time high.  Weiner was following the same trajectory, leading the race for the Democratic nomination for mayor.

On the other hand, now he's a repeat offender.  In July 2012 he told People magazine that he had "tried to become a better person" every day since the sexting scandal.  The latest indiscretion seems to have started just days after he gave that interview.  Now The New York Times has called for Weiner to "take his marital troubles and personal compulsions out of the public eye, away from the cameras, off the Web and out of the race for mayor of New York City."  And the Daily News stated, "He is not fit to lead America's premier city."  What voters decide about him will say something significant about morality in America.

George Bernard Shaw observed, "Democracy is a device that insures we shall be governed no better than we deserve."  Why is personal immorality less relevant to political success today?

Here's my theory: So long as the personal failures of a politician don't affect us personally, we think they're none of our business.  In fact, many of us affirm failed leaders because their mistakes legitimize our own. However, we are intolerant of anyone we consider to be intolerant, as illustrated by the escalation of discrimination against Christians who "discriminate" against homosexuals.  (Note the irony.)

Shakespeare observed, "some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall."  While that may be true in American politics, God warns: "Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people" (Proverbs 14:34).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

COMMIT TO

In the face of widespread insecurity, fear, and hopelessness, our nation desperately needs your prayers. Join us in praying for our nation, that God will heal our land.
Post a Comment
Read more

Pablo reprende a Pedro

Pero cuando Pedro vino a Antioquía, le resistí cara a cara, porque era de condenar. Pues antes que viniesen algunos de parte de Jacobo, comía con los gentiles; pero después que vinieron, se retraía y se apartaba, porque tenía miedo de los de la circuncisión. Y en su simulación participaban también los otros judíos, de tal manera que aun Bernabé fue también arrastrado por la hipocresía de ellos. Pero cuando vi que no andaban rectamente conforme a la verdad del evangelio, dije a Pedro delante de todos: Si tú, siendo judío, vives como los gentiles y no como judío, ¿por qué obligas a los gentiles a judaizar? Nosotros, judíos de nacimiento, y no pecadores de entre los gentiles, sabiendo que el hombre no es justificado por las obras de la ley, sino por la fe de Jesucristo, nosotros también hemos creído en Jesucristo, para ser justificados por la fe de Cristo y no por las obras de la ley, por cuanto por las obras de la ley nadie será justificado. Y si buscando ser justificados en Cristo, tamb...
Post a Comment
Read more

El quebrantamiento de Pedro

If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view .     Leer | Lucas 22.54-62 11 de noviembre de 2014 El orgullo de Pedro era un obstáculo para los propósitos de Dios. Cristo buscaba a un siervo-líder para que guiara a los creyentes una vez que Él regresara al cielo. El antiguo pescador era un impulsivo sabelotodo, pero el Señor vio su potencial a pesar de su arrogancia. Por eso, el gran Artesano utilizó una filosa herramienta —la humillación— para quebrantarlo. Cuando las palabras del Señor estuvieron en conflicto con la opinión de Pedro, el discípulo reprendió temerariamente a Jesús. El Salvador respondió con una virulenta reprimenda, tanto para silenciar como para enseñar ( Mt 16.21-23 ; Jn 13.5-8 ). Inclusive, Pedro incumplió su promesa de morir por el Señor cuando lo negó tres veces ...
Post a Comment
Read more